From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNjvC-00088S-Jb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 06:33:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNjvB-00026I-JH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 06:32:54 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNjvB-00026A-9F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 06:32:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 06:31:50 -0500 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Message-ID: <20111108113150.GA13195@redhat.com> References: <20111106231953.GD4500@thunk.org> <20111107175942.GA9395@elte.hu> <20111107203514.GG24234@thunk.org> <20111108102235.GA1241@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111108102235.GA1241@elte.hu> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [F.A.Q.] perf ABI backwards and forwards compatibility List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Graf , Ted Ts'o , Peter Zijlstra , "kvm@vger.kernel.org list" , qemu-devel Developers , Vince Weaver , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" , Pekka Enberg , Blue Swirl , Pekka Enberg , Avi Kivity , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang , Linus Torvalds Hi - On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:22:35AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > [...] These examples show *PICTURE PERFECT* forwards ABI > compatibility, using the ancient perf tool on a bleeding edge > kernel. [...] Almost: they demonstrate that those parts of the ABI that these particular perf commands rely on have been impressively compatible. Do you have any sort of ABI coverage measurement, to see what parts of the ABI these perf commands do not use? - FChE