qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] virDomainBlockJobAbort and block_job_cancel
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:31:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111124053112.GV11916@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ECD19A2.4010501@redhat.com>

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:04:50AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 07:48 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > This means that virDomainBlockJobAbort() returns to the client without
> > a guarantee that the job has completed.  If the client enumerates jobs
> > it may still see a job that has not finished cancelling.  The client
> > must register a handler for the BLOCK_JOB_CANCELLED event if it wants
> > to know when the job really goes away.  The BLOCK_JOB_CANCELLED event
> > has the same fields as the BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED event, except it lacks
> > the optional "error" message field.
> > 
> > The impact on clients is that they need to add a BLOCK_JOB_CANCELLED
> > handler if they really want to wait.  Most clients today (not many
> > exist) will be fine without waiting for cancellation.
> > 
> > Any objections or thoughts on this?
> 
> virDomainBlockJobAbort() thankfully has an 'unsigned int flags'
> argument.  For backwards-compatibility, I suggest we use it:
> 
> calling virDomainBlockJobAbort(,0) maintains old blocking behavior, and
> we document that blocking until things abort may render the rest of
> interactions with the domain unresponsive.
> 
> The new virDomainBlockJobAbort(,VIR_DOMAIN_BLOCK_JOB_ABORT_ASYNC) would
> then implement your new proposed semantics of returning immediately once
> the cancellation has been requested, even if it hasn't been acted on yet.
> 
> Maybe you could convince me to swap the flags: have 0 change semantics
> to non-blocking, and a new flag to request blocking, where callers that
> care have to try the flag, and if the flag is unsupported then they know
> they are talking to older libvirtd where the behavior is blocking by
> default, but that's a bit riskier.

  Agreed, I would rather not change the current call semantic,
but an ASYNC flag would be a really good addition. We can document
the risk of not using it in the function description and suggest
new applications use ASYNC flag.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel@veillard.com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-24  5:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-23 14:48 [Qemu-devel] virDomainBlockJobAbort and block_job_cancel Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-11-23 16:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Eric Blake
2011-11-24  5:31   ` Daniel Veillard [this message]
2011-11-24  9:21     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-07 22:35       ` Adam Litke
2011-12-07 23:01         ` Eric Blake
2011-12-08 14:55           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-08 14:55           ` Adam Litke
2011-12-08 15:33             ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111124053112.GV11916@redhat.com \
    --to=veillard@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).