From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41353) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVlG5-0007pD-SS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:35:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVlG0-0001lU-IE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:35:37 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVlG0-0001lB-BI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:35:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:35:23 +0200 From: Alon Levy Message-ID: <20111130143523.GC19650@garlic.tlv.redhat.com> References: <8762i3nczx.fsf@trasno.mitica> <4ED50F7C.2040903@redhat.com> <4ED563E7.3040508@codemonkey.ws> <20111130092237.GB24074@garlic> <20111130095456.GE28621@redhat.com> <4ED63596.6090303@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ED63596.6090303@codemonkey.ws> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for November 29 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Developers qemu-devel , Avi Kivity , KVM devel mailing list , quintela@redhat.com On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:54:30AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: [snip] > But the way we're structuring QOM, we could do very simple bindings > that just used introspection (much like GObject does). Is this the current tree? http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori.git/tree/refs/heads/qom > > The vast majority of work is fitting everything into an object > model. Doing the bindings is actually fairly simple. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > [snip]