From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVn2l-000114-Ma for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:30:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVn2h-0000Ay-KL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:29:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVn2h-0000Au-6v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:29:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:29:47 -0800 From: Chris Wright Message-ID: <20111130162947.GA26932@x200.localdomain> References: <4ED63F5C.8000808@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ED63F5C.8000808@us.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call Agenda for 12/6 (Tuesday) @ 10am US/Eastern List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "libvir-list@redhat.com" , Chris Wright , "arch@ovirt.org" , qemu-devel , Juan Quintela * Anthony Liguori (aliguori@us.ibm.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose that we discuss guest agent convergence in our next KVM > call. I've CC'd folks from oVirt and libvirt to join the discussion. > > I think we should probably attempt to have some structure to the discussion. > I would suggest: > > 1. A short introduction to each of the guest agents, what guests they > support, and what verbs they support. I think we did this once before w/ Matahari. Can we please capture these things in email before the call, so people actually have time to ponder the details. > 2. A short description of key requirements from each party (oVirt, libvirt, > QEMU) for a guest agent Same here...call this the abstract/intro of the above detailed list of verbs and guest support, and send it by Friday this week. I know there's plenty of details buried in the current thread and old discussions of Matahari. But that's just it...buried... > 3. An open discussion about possible ways to collaborate/converge. That should really help facilitate this item ;) thanks, -chris