From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Autefage <899140@bugs.launchpad.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 899140] Re: Problem with Linux Kernel Traffic Control
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:26:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111205082617.GA20569@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EDB98B2.6070408@labri.fr>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 03:54:12PM -0000, Vincent Autefage wrote:
> The result without TC is about 120 Mbit/s.
> I check the bandwidth with lot of programs (not only with Iperf) and the
> result is also the same....
>
> However, if I use the same raw image and the same TC configuration with
> the version 0.14.0 of QEMU or with some real physical hosts, the result
> with TC is about 19.2 Mbit/s what is the desired result...
Thanks for checking if tc is involved in this bug.
Git bisect can identify which commit introduced the bug between QEMU
0.14.0 and 0.14.1. The following steps show how to do this:
Clone the QEMU git repository:
$ git clone git://git.qemu.org/qemu.git
$ cd qemu
Double-check that 0.14.1 has the bug:
$ git checkout v0.14.1
$ make distclean
$ ./configure --target-list=x86_64-softmmu
$ make
$ # test x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 binary
Double-check that 0.14.0 does *not* have the bug:
$ git checkout v0.14.0
$ make distclean
$ ./configure --target-list=x86_64-softmmu
$ make
$ # test x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 binary
Now you can be confident that 0.14.0 and 0.14.1 do indeed behave
differently when built from source. It's time to perform the bisect,
you can read more about what this does in the git-bisect(1) man page.
Find the commit that introduced the bug:
$ git bisect start v0.14.1 0.14.0
$ make distclean
$ ./configure --target-list=x86_64-softmmu
$ make
$ # test x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 binary
If tc achieves ~20 Mbit/s:
$ git bisect good
Otherwise:
$ git bisect bad
Git bisect will keep splitting the commit history in half until it
reaches the point where QEMU's behavior changes from good to bad. So
you typically need to build and test a couple of times until the guilty
commit has been identified.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-05 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-02 12:57 [Qemu-devel] [Bug 899140] [NEW] Problem with Linux Kernel Traffic Control Vincent Autefage
2011-12-02 13:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [Bug 899140] " Vincent Autefage
2011-12-02 13:34 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-02 14:42 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-03 18:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-04 15:54 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-05 8:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2011-12-05 10:45 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-05 11:11 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-05 12:24 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-07 10:57 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-14 13:36 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-14 14:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-14 14:27 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-14 14:42 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-15 8:07 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-15 15:03 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-15 16:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-15 16:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-15 16:48 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-16 8:31 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-29 4:49 ` Henrique Rodrigues
2012-01-30 16:30 ` Vincent Autefage
2012-01-31 4:49 ` Henrique Rodrigues
2012-02-09 19:05 ` Henrique Rodrigues
2012-02-10 9:25 ` Vincent Autefage
2017-02-07 12:47 ` Thomas Huth
2017-04-09 4:17 ` Launchpad Bug Tracker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111205082617.GA20569@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=899140@bugs.launchpad.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).