From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41987) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXW95-0007Iz-Hh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:51:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXW91-0006gE-0l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:51:39 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXW90-0006gA-Pj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:51:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 10:51:29 +0000 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20111205105129.GB2734@redhat.com> References: <4ED7F059.8040408@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ED7F059.8040408@us.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] QEMU 1.0 release Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 03:23:37PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Hi, > > On behalf of the QEMU Team, I'd like to announce the availability of > QEMU 1.0! Great to see the release out now. Could you clarify the intention for release numbering from this point onwards. Is it correct to say that subsequent feature releases will be 1.x and that the 3-digit version numbers (1.0.x, 1.1.x, etc) will be reserved for possible stable release branches ? Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|