From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60469) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RasRB-00089h-IE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:16:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RasRA-0002RX-CF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:16:13 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:48054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RasRA-0002RN-80 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:16:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:15:58 -0600 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Message-ID: <20111214171558.GA27963@sergelap> References: <4EDFAF91.4070904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4EDFB4F0.70406@codemonkey.ws> <1660519.SAi13A61Ja@sifl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1660519.SAi13A61Ja@sifl> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Device sandboxing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Moore Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Corey Bryant , Michael Halcrow , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eric Paris , Ashley D Lai , Avi Kivity , Richa Marwaha , Amit Shah , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Eduardo Terrell Ferrari Otubo , Lee Terrell , George Wilson Quoting Paul Moore (pmoore@redhat.com): > On Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12:48:16 PM Anthony Liguori wrote: > > On 12/07/2011 12:25 PM, Corey Bryant wrote: > > > A group of us are starting to work on sandboxing QEMU device emulation > > > code. We're just getting started investigating various approaches, and > > > want to engage the community to gather input. > > > > > Following are the design points that we are currently considering: > > > > To be perfectly honest, I think prototyping and measuring performance is > > going to be the only way to figure out the right approach here. > > Agreed. I'm currently working on a prototype to play around with some of the > ideas discussed in this thread. As soon as it is functional I'll send a > pointer/patches/etc. to the list. Hey Paul, just wondering, exactly which approache(s) are you prototyping? Are you touching seccomp2? thanks, -serge