From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfupM-0004Ay-0t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:50:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfupK-0006bP-4W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:49:59 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:43339 helo=newverein.lst.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfupJ-0006bH-V9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:49:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:49:56 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Message-ID: <20111228144956.GA19147@lst.de> References: <4EEF70B4.3070109@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EEF70B4.3070109@us.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] qemu-test: a set of tests scripts for QEMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "lmr@redhat.com" , Dor Laor , Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel , Stefan Hajnoczi On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:13:24AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Hi, > > I've published a set of tests I wrote over the weekend on qemu.org. My > motivations were 1) to prevent regressions like the libguestfs one and 2) > to have an easier way to do development testing as I work on QEMU Object > Model. > > Now before sending the obligatory, "What about using KVM autotest" reply, > note that this is significantly different than KVM autotest and really > occupies a different use-case. Different question: Do you want to merge qemu-iotests into it?