From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49898)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1RgIiE-0005Xy-Sa
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:20:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1RgIiD-0007sk-Ku
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:20:14 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22153)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1RgIiD-0007sT-4C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:20:13 -0500
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:21:29 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20111229162129.GG2300@redhat.com>
References: <4EFA9DF0.7050902@endace.com> <20111228114329.GC26310@redhat.com>
	<D0B75B542AA3C648B838B5A90BE651C72C927E85@nzhmlmbx01.ad.endace.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D0B75B542AA3C648B838B5A90BE651C72C927E85@nzhmlmbx01.ad.endace.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Seabios] [PATCH 0/3] 64bit PCI BARs allocations
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexey Korolev <Alexey.Korolev@endace.com>
Cc: Stephen Donnelly <Stephen.Donnelly@endace.com>, "yamahata@valinux.co.jp" <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>, "seabios@seabios.org" <seabios@seabios.org>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 09:20:00AM +0000, Alexey Korolev wrote:
> >>
> > Patches have been tested on several configurations which includes
> >> linux 2.6.18 - 3.0 &
> >> windows 2008. Everything works quite well.
> 
> >Which qemu version did you use?
> I tried both 0.15 and 1.0
qemu or qemu-kcm?