From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48299) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rik81-0000Cu-MP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:00:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rik7w-0004lR-3w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:00:57 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rik7v-0004j8-ON for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:00:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:00:48 +0200 From: Gleb Natapov Message-ID: <20120105100048.GD31206@redhat.com> References: <4F055827.50202@redhat.com> <20120105083239.GR2072@redhat.com> <20120105092037.GA31206@redhat.com> <20120105092957.GB31206@redhat.com> <20120105094222.GC31206@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Boot order problem and disable iPXE/gPXE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerhard Wiesinger Cc: Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >boot option is deprecated in favor of bootindex. The later has much more > >fine grained control of boot sequence. What if you have 5 SCSI > >controllers? Even boot=c does not tell you much if you have more then > >one disk. > > Ok, then this is a documentation issue (command line, etc.): > 1.) boot should be documented as deprecated with "use bootindex instead" > 2.) bootindex should be documented at all > Agree. Documentation is missing. bootindex is a device property (in QEMU terms) and those are not documented in qemu help screen. Don't know where is the proper place to add documentation for that. -- Gleb.