From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Mark McLoughlin" <markmc@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Alexander Graf" <agraf@suse.de>,
"Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
"Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <andreas.faerber@web.de>,
"Hervé Poussineau" <hpoussin@reactos.org>,
"Avi Kivity" <avi@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
"Stefan Weil" <sw@weilnetz.de>,
"Riku Voipio" <riku.voipio@iki.fi>,
"Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
"Daniel Gollub" <gollub@b1-systems.de>,
"Luiz Capitulino" <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
"Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)" <jvrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>,
"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Vassili Karpov (malc)" <av1474@comtv.ru>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Michael Walle" <michael@walle.cc>,
"Amit Shah" <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Aurelien Jarno" <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Please read: make check framework
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:47:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201201091747.52115.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F0B1016.2010600@us.ibm.com>
> I'm going to apply this series quickly and will start running 'make
> check-quick' as part a sniff test before pushing patches.
>
> I'd like to request that all maintainers/submaintainers do the same and
> that everyone contributes unit tests to this target.
>
> The general rules for 'make check-quick':
>
> 1) It must complete in less than 10 minutes start to finish (the entire
> rule). We can re-examine this over time but for now, it seems like a
> reasonable limit.
No objection in principle, though I'm a bit unclear on the guidelines.
In particular:
- 10 minutes on what hardware? 10 minutes on one of my fat build machines is
an hour on an average year-old laptop/desktop, and I guess 6+ hours on the
netbook I use when travelling. Maybe relating this to the time taken to do a
clean build would make more sense?
- What level of testing is appropriate? As a maintainer when can/should I
bounce a patch due to lack of tests? e.g should new device emulation come with
unit tests? New infrastructure? What about fixes to both of the above, should
these include regression tests? Given the size of the test surface for many
components (in particular emulated CPUs), I'm guessing we're looking at
extremely basic smoke-tests. Consistent regression tests or any sort of
architecture conformance tests are going to completely blow your time budget.
Obviously level of testing is always a bit of a judgement call - anyone who
claims of have complete test coverage is either lying or writing trivially
uninteresting code. However given qemu has historically had zero active test
coverage I'd appreciate some guidance (as both maintainers and contrubutor).
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-09 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-09 15:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] tests: mv tests/* -> tests/tcg Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/11] build: split unit test builds to a separate makefile fragment Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 19:23 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-09 19:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/11] check-qdict: convert to gtest Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 18:27 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-09 19:15 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 19:37 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-09 19:26 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-09 19:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/11] check-qfloat: " Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/11] check-qint: " Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/11] check-qstring: " Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/11] check-qlist: " Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/11] check-qjson: " Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/11] check-qjson: enable disabled tests Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/11] test: eliminate libcheck tests and have make check use gtester Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 19:35 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-10 9:17 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-01-10 13:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/11] check: add a check-report and check-help target Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 20:00 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-09 16:04 ` [Qemu-devel] Please read: make check framework Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 16:16 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-09 16:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 16:47 ` Daniel Gollub
2012-01-09 17:47 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2012-01-09 19:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 20:57 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-09 21:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-09 23:22 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-09 23:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-10 9:57 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-10 13:11 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-10 14:49 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-10 15:39 ` Peter Maydell
2012-01-09 20:00 ` Stefan Weil
2012-01-10 8:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-10 13:21 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-09 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] tests: mv tests/* -> tests/tcg Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201201091747.52115.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=andreas.faerber@web.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=av1474@comtv.ru \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=gollub@b1-systems.de \
--cc=hpoussin@reactos.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=jvrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=riku.voipio@iki.fi \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).