From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50275)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mtosatti@redhat.com>) id 1RncJM-00088e-KZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:40:49 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mtosatti@redhat.com>) id 1RncJK-0007yq-Nr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:40:48 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54814)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mtosatti@redhat.com>) id 1RncJK-0007yg-HM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:40:46 -0500
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:39:22 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20120118203922.GA32075@amt.cnet>
References: <cover.1326729350.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
	<20120118094826.GA13763@amt.cnet> <4F1726F2.3070105@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F1726F2.3070105@web.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 00/18] uq/master: Introduce basic
	irqchip support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:09:22PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Patchset does not apply, please regenarate
> 
> OK, working on it. I think it had some build issue with !CONFIG_KVM anyway.
> 
> > (patch 2 is missing actual
> > file move), thanks.
> 
> Hmm, possibly requires a fairly recent diff. Are you fine with pulling
> from my tree? Then I will attach the url, otherwise expand this.

Pull is OK.