From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] qdev: Introduce lost tick policy property
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:01:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120123200155.GA7286@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4a4da9c3ce17f84278c489549ea5f7be8f4321c.1327346110.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:15:11PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Potentially tick-generating timer devices will gain a common property:
> lock_tick_policy. It allows to encode 4 different ways how to deal with
> tick events the guest did not process in time:
>
> discard - ignore lost ticks (e.g. if the guest compensates for them
> already)
> delay - replay all lost ticks in a row once the guest accepts them
> again
> merge - if multiple ticks are lost, all of them are merged into one
> which is replayed once the guest accepts it again
> slew - lost ticks are gradually replayed at a higher frequency than
> the original tick
>
> Not all timer device will need to support all modes. However, all need
> to accept the configuration via this common property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
That looks good - thank you for making the effort to come up with
something that maps so well to the libvirt model for this concept.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-23 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 19:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Generic tick reinjection control Jan Kiszka
2012-01-23 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] qdev: Introduce lost tick policy property Jan Kiszka
2012-01-23 20:01 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2012-01-23 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] mc146818rtc: Use lost_tick_policy property Jan Kiszka
2012-01-23 19:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Generic tick reinjection control Anthony Liguori
2012-02-01 22:10 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120123200155.GA7286@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).