From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Korolev <alexey.korolev@endace.com>
Cc: sfd@endace.com, Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC/PATCH] Fix guest OS panic when 64bit BAR is present
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:51:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120125125131.GC22203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F1F971B.4020309@endace.com>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
> Hi,
> In this post
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-12/msg03171.html I've
> mentioned about the issues when 64Bit PCI BAR is present and 32bit
> address range is selected for it.
> The issue affects all recent qemu releases and all
> old and recent guest Linux kernel versions.
>
> We've done some investigations. Let me explain what happens.
> Assume we have 64bit BAR with size 32MB mapped at [0xF0000000 -
> 0xF2000000]
>
> When Linux guest starts it does PCI bus enumeration.
> The OS enumerates 64BIT bars using the following procedure.
> 1. Write all FF's to lower half of 64bit BAR
> 2. Write address back to lower half of 64bit BAR
> 3. Write all FF's to higher half of 64bit BAR
> 4. Write address back to higher half of 64bit BAR
>
> Linux code is here:
> http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.2.1/drivers/pci/probe.c#L149
>
> What does it mean for qemu?
>
> At step 1. qemu pci_default_write_config() recevies all FFs for lower
> part of the 64bit BAR. Then it applies the mask and converts the value
> to "All FF's - size + 1" (FE000000 if size is 32MB).
> Then pci_bar_address() checks if BAR address is valid. Since it is a
> 64bit bar it reads 0x00000000FE000000 - this address is valid. So qemu
> updates topology and sends request to update mappings in KVM with new
> range for the 64bit BAR FE000000 - 0xFFFFFFFF. This usually means kernel
> panic on boot, if there is another mapping in the FE000000 - 0xFFFFFFFF
> range, which is quite common.
>
>
> The following patch fixes the issue. It affects 64bit PCI BAR's only.
> The idea of the patch is: we introduce the states for low and high BARs
> whose can have 3 possible values: BAR_VALID, PCIBAR64_PARTIAL_SIZE_QUERY
> - someone has requested size of one half of the 64bit PCI BAR,
> PCIBAR64_PARTIAL_ADDR_PROGRAM - someone has sent a request to update the
> address of one half of the 64bit PCI BAR. The state becomes BAR_VALID
> when both halfs are in the same state. We ignore BAR value until both
> states become BAR_VALID
>
> Note: Please use the latest Seabios version (commit
> 139d5ac037de828f89c36e39c6dd15610650cede and later), as older versions
> didn't initialize high part of 64bit BAR.
>
> The patch is tested on Linux 2.6.18 - 3.1.0 and Windows 2008 Server
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Korolev <alexey.korolev@endace.com>
Interesting. However, looking at guest code,
I note that memory and io are disabled
during BAR sizing unless mmio always on is set.
pci_bar_address should return PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED
in this case, and we should never map this BAR
until it's enabled. What's going on?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-25 5:46 [Qemu-devel] [RFC/PATCH] Fix guest OS panic when 64bit BAR is present Alexey Korolev
2012-01-25 12:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2012-01-26 3:20 ` Alexey Korolev
2012-01-25 15:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-25 18:59 ` Alex Williamson
2012-01-26 3:19 ` Alexey Korolev
2012-01-26 13:51 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-26 14:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-26 14:33 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-26 9:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-26 13:52 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-26 14:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-26 15:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-27 4:42 ` Alexey Korolev
2012-01-31 9:40 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-31 9:43 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-01 5:44 ` Alexey Korolev
2012-02-01 7:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-02-02 2:22 ` Alexey Korolev
2012-01-31 10:51 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-27 4:40 ` Alexey Korolev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120125125131.GC22203@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alexey.korolev@endace.com \
--cc=kevin@koconnor.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sfd@endace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).