From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Rob Herring" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"Paul Brook" <paul@codesourcery.com>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
"Jeremy Kerr" <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: add device tree support
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 06:33:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130133352.GG28397@ponder.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9YKLG68EUY53qb6Z=burW5Ex4G6dCFTLNZXuckm0zp=A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 09:29:58PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 29 January 2012 18:48, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> > Am 29.01.2012 17:01, schrieb Grant Likely:
> >> Okay, well at least let's start with this. Here is an updated version of the
> >> patch that doesn't touch the board code. It makes the -dtb option available
> >> to all ARM platforms.
> >>
> >> Even if dtb is not the primary structure, we absolutely need this option.
> >
> > Well, the option itself is what has been the most controversial here.
> > Yours is at least the third attempt, so far we've seen discussed -dtb,
> > -kern-dtb, -kernel-dtb, -kernel dtb=, etc.
>
> FWIW, my vote is for '-dtb' because it parallels the existing -initrd
> and -append. (Or -devicetree if we think -dtb is too cryptic; but anyway
> not something with 'kernel' in it.)
That was my reasoning too. I'm not stuck on any particular flag though as
long as the feature gets merged. :-)
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-27 21:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: add device tree support Grant Likely
2012-01-27 22:34 ` Paul Brook
2012-01-28 18:48 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-29 11:15 ` Paul Brook
2012-01-29 16:01 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-29 18:48 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-29 21:29 ` Peter Maydell
2012-01-30 13:33 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-01-29 19:13 ` Peter Maydell
2012-01-29 20:36 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-30 11:36 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 13:31 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-30 0:24 ` John Williams
2012-01-29 20:42 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2012-01-29 23:54 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2012-01-30 13:40 ` Grant Likely
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-29 7:48 Peter Crosthwaite
2012-02-22 19:48 Peter Maydell
2012-02-27 17:38 Peter Maydell
2012-02-27 17:41 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120130133352.GG28397@ponder.secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremy.kerr@canonical.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).