From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qmp: add BLOCK_MEDIUM_EJECT event
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:36:56 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130133656.2c164bd9@doriath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F22943F.5080704@redhat.com>
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:10:39 +0100
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/24/2012 07:16 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > @@ -237,6 +238,17 @@ static bool do_check_io_limits(BlockIOLimit *io_limits)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +static void on_medium_eject(BlockDriverState *bs, int is_ejected)
> > +{
> > + QObject *data;
> > +
> > + data = qobject_from_jsonf("{ 'device': %s, 'ejected': %i }",
> > + bdrv_get_device_name(bs), is_ejected);
> > + monitor_protocol_event(QEVENT_BLOCK_MEDIUM_EJECT, data);
> > +
> > + qobject_decref(data);
> > +}
> > +
> > DriveInfo *drive_init(QemuOpts *opts, int default_to_scsi)
> > {
> > const char *buf;
> > @@ -503,6 +515,7 @@ DriveInfo *drive_init(QemuOpts *opts, int default_to_scsi)
> > QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&drives, dinfo, next);
> >
> > bdrv_set_on_error(dinfo->bdrv, on_read_error, on_write_error);
> > + bdrv_dev_set_medium_eject_notify(dinfo->bdrv, on_medium_eject);
> >
> > /* disk I/O throttling */
> > bdrv_set_io_limits(dinfo->bdrv, &io_limits);
>
> block.c/blockdev.c separation is nice, but do we really need a function
> pointer? Also, we're already emitting the BLOCK_IO_ERROR event in
> block.c; is that another place to cleanup, or is this overkill and we
> can just put bdrv_dev_medium_eject_notify in block.c?
This patch has changed after this whole discussion. My current version (not
posted yet) adds a bdrv_emit_qmp_error_event() function to block.c and call
it from bdrv_eject(). But that accounts only for the guest initiated ejects...
> > diff --git a/hw/ide/atapi.c b/hw/ide/atapi.c
> > index 0adb27b..4b4bc61 100644
> > --- a/hw/ide/atapi.c
> > +++ b/hw/ide/atapi.c
> > @@ -885,6 +885,7 @@ static void cmd_start_stop_unit(IDEState*s, uint8_t* buf)
> > }
> > bdrv_eject(s->bs, !start);
> > s->tray_open = !start;
> > + bdrv_dev_medium_eject_notify(s->bs, !start);
> > }
> >
> > ide_atapi_cmd_ok(s);
> > diff --git a/hw/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi-disk.c
> > index 5d8bf53..35e55f4 100644
> > --- a/hw/scsi-disk.c
> > +++ b/hw/scsi-disk.c
> > @@ -1061,6 +1061,7 @@ static int scsi_disk_emulate_start_stop(SCSIDiskReq *r)
> > }
> > bdrv_eject(s->qdev.conf.bs, !start);
> > s->tray_open = !start;
> > + bdrv_dev_medium_eject_notify(s->qdev.conf.bs, !start);
> > }
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Can you do the call directly in bdrv_eject (but I would skip
> bdrv_close)? The only other place where bdrv_eject is called is from
> block/raw.c's raw_eject, but I think you should only emit the event if
> bs->device_name[0] (otherwise the event is quite useless) and bs->file
> will fail the test.
Good point.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-24 18:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qmp: add BLOCK_MEDIUM_EJECT event Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-24 20:03 ` Eric Blake
2012-01-25 8:41 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-25 12:42 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-25 13:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-25 13:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-25 13:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-25 13:49 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-01-25 13:42 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-26 17:57 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-27 9:52 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-27 12:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-30 15:18 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-30 15:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-30 15:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-31 8:33 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-31 9:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-01-31 13:46 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-25 10:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-01-25 13:31 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-25 14:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-01-27 12:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-30 15:36 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120130133656.2c164bd9@doriath \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).