From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFGS-0000l6-R1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:05:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFGM-0000Da-4Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:56 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFGL-0000DR-T5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:04:48 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20120131150447.GA2899@redhat.com> References: <87ehuhrpel.fsf@elfo.elfo> <4F272A92.2010609@suse.de> <4F272D8C.8020608@codemonkey.ws> <4F27E98E.2080501@suse.de> <4F27F6CD.1000807@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F27F6CD.1000807@codemonkey.ws> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for tuesday 31 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Developers qemu-devel , Mitsyanko Igor , Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= , KVM devel mailing list , quintela@redhat.com On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:12:29AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 01/31/2012 07:15 AM, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > >Am 31.01.2012 00:53, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > >>On 01/30/2012 05:41 PM, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > >>>Am 30.01.2012 19:55, schrieb Juan Quintela: > >>>>Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > > >>>VMState: > >>>Anthony specifically said that VMState were not affected by QOM and = that > >>>patches should not be deferred until the merge. Yet there's no revie= w > >>>and/or decision-making for a month now. Ping^2 for AHCI+SDHC. > >> > >>Do you have pointers (to pending VMState patches)? > > > >http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/137732/ (PATCH v4) > > > >It's basically about how to deal with variable-sized arrays. (Alex > >mentioned it on one call around November.) I found ways to deal with > >subsets of arrays embedded within the struct and variable-sized list o= f > >pointers to structs but no solution for a malloc()'ed array of structs. > >Maybe I'm just too stupid to see. Anyway, no one commented since Xmas. >=20 > /me puts on his flame proof suit >=20 > Don't use VMState. Just open code a save/restore function. VMState > is too limited in how it handles complex data structures. >=20 > I really believe the only long term solution we're going to get to > here is something that uses a builder interface (like Visitors). >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Anthony Liguori So the TPM patches started implementing a visitor interface for BER, they are still blocked, right? > > > >Igor posted (and refined for v2) a patch with a callback-based approac= h > >that I find promising. From my view, unofficially Juan is the VMState > >guy, he's been cc'ed. Are we lacking an official maintainer that cares= ? > >Or is Juan the official, undocumented maintainer but simply busy? > > > >SUSE's interest is making AHCI migratable, and my VMState workaround f= or > >that is simply ugly: > > > >http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/133066/ (RFC) > > > >Therefore I'm waiting for some resolution. > > > >Regards, > >Andreas > > >=20 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html