From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35405) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtMGm-0001gp-K8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:45:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtMGg-0001Oj-RA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:45:52 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtMGg-0001OH-Gw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:45:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:45:35 -0200 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20120203144535.1be8a569@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <4F2C0D45.1020701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1328212740-15799-1-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120203121803.6963d24f@doriath.home> <4F2C0D45.1020701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/8] qemu-ga: add support for Windows List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Roth Cc: ghammer@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:37:25 -0600 Michael Roth wrote: > On 02/03/2012 08:18 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 13:58:52 -0600 > > Michael Roth wrote: > > > >> These patches apply on top of qemu.git master, and can also be obtained from: > >> git://github.com/mdroth/qemu.git qga-win32-v2 > >> > >> Luiz/Gal, I decided not to roll the suspend/hibernate stuff into this series > >> since the s3 situation isn't fully sorted out yet. The file structure is a > >> little different now, posix/linux-specific stuff goes in qga/commands-posix.c, > >> win32-specific stuff in qga/commands-win32.c, but other than that it should be > >> a straightforward rebase if this gets merged first. > > > > I think I'll have to rebase my series on top of this one, when do you plan to > > merge this? > > > > Hopefully soon, was planning on waiting for the suspend/hibernate bits > but we seem to be blocked on the s3 issues and I have other patches > accumulating on top of win32 (hesitant to base those on master since > this patchset does a lot of refactoring that might affect them), so I > figured I'd push this for merge since it doesn't have any dependencies > outside master. The S3 issues seem sorted to me, but I don't oppose having this series in first.