qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Support for multiboot images in elf64 (EM_X86_64) format
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 00:35:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201202090035.12216.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QVr-5AER7fhbS_jO2FTzy0scnUYiy8eAc4cByuK_i5r1g@mail.gmail.com>

> > starting your own toy kernel is a fun thing to do and there are many
> > tutorials out there on how to do it. Unfortunately when one wants to
> > write a kernel in 64bit it becomes much harder because one can't
> > compile 64bit code as elf32 image and converting a elf64 image to
> > elf32 format is a major hassle and looses debug information and symbols.

So just have two versions of your image:
- The elf64 image that has debug info, symbols, etc.  Point gdb at this.
- An elf32 image that you give to the bootloader (in this case kvm)

Generating the latter from the former is a trivial objcopy invocation.
The bootloader variant only needs enough information to get the loadable 
sections into memory.  We don't care about non-resident clutter like debug 
info or symbols.  Anything that cares about those will be using the full elf64 
image.

This is all standard practice.  I don't think I've never actually used a 
system where the image loaded by the target is the same file as the one that 
comes out of the linker and is used by the debugger.

> Yes, this is why I asked about support in other software.  If each
> bootloader implements a different custom method then it will be a pain
> to run your binary on real hardware in the future.  It's worth at
> least checking their source first - maybe there is already a similar
> code path that we can be compatible with, hence making life easier for
> developers who want to play with 64-bit payloads in multiboot
> executables.

The whole idea of entering a 64-bit image in 32-bit mode seems distinctly 
sketchy.  Surely it'd make more sense to define a 64-bit multiboot variant and 
do the job properly.

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-09  0:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-04 17:38 [Qemu-devel] Support for multiboot images in elf64 (EM_X86_64) format Goswin von Brederlow
2012-02-06 12:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-02-08  9:53   ` Goswin von Brederlow
2012-02-08 11:30     ` Kevin Wolf
2012-02-08 12:06     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-02-09  0:35       ` Paul Brook [this message]
2012-02-09 13:07         ` Goswin von Brederlow
2012-02-09 13:36           ` Paul Brook
2012-02-09 15:38             ` Goswin von Brederlow
2012-02-09 16:01               ` Paul Brook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201202090035.12216.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=goswin-v-b@web.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).