From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46173) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rz8lC-0000Ov-5Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:33:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rz8lB-0003cL-4p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:33:10 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23794) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rz8lA-0003cF-SD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:33:09 -0500 Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:33:10 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20120219153310.GF16620@redhat.com> References: <4F1EF6CE.9060306@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [QEMU] net: adapt dump to support the new syntax List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Zhi Yong Wu , Benjamin , qemu-devel On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:55:40AM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: > > I would like to know if some one is playing around with the patchset. > > > > If yes, can any one make one response? I am very interested in rebasing > > it, and then playing with it. > > AFAIK no one is working on it - the main thing that is missing here is > tests so that we don't break the existing "VLAN" feature and > command-line interface. In fact dump is the only reason we keep VLANs around. Otherwise IMO we could just remove them. > If you have time to play with stuff though it would be good to fix the > block I/O limits issue with IDE. > > Stefan