From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzE9P-0000n7-CD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:18:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzE9O-0002nk-2a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:18:31 -0500 Received: from alpha.arachsys.com ([91.203.57.7]:45119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzE9N-0002nW-QV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:18:29 -0500 Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:18:23 +0000 From: Chris Webb Message-ID: <20120219211822.GA28059@arachsys.com> References: <1329664586-13923-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1329664586-13923-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: fix block I/O throtting with IDE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: zwu.kernel@gmail.com Cc: Zhi Yong Wu , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com zwu.kernel@gmail.com writes: > The patch is based on the latest QEMU upstream. If you will backport the > patchset to QEMU 1.0, pls note the difference. I would indeed quite like to backport this to qemu 1.0! Am I right in thinking the sanest way to do this is to apply 922453bca6a9 to bring all the relevant qemu_aio_flush() calls through the same place before I apply your patch? Best wishes, Chris.