From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzQ4Q-00081V-Qi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:02:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzQ4K-00041b-Os for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:02:10 -0500 Received: from alpha.arachsys.com ([91.203.57.7]:42034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzQ4K-00041P-FY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:02:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:02:01 +0000 From: Chris Webb Message-ID: <20120220100200.GA23662@arachsys.com> References: <1329664586-13923-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> <20120219211822.GA28059@arachsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: fix block I/O throtting with IDE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Zhi Yong Wu Cc: Zhi Yong Wu , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com Zhi Yong Wu writes: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Chris Webb wrote: > > I would indeed quite like to backport this to qemu 1.0! Am I right in > > thinking the sanest way to do this is to apply 922453bca6a9 to bring all the > > relevant qemu_aio_flush() calls through the same place before I apply your > > patch? > For how to backport it to qemu 1.0, i don't know how to help you, sorry. For the list archives: the patches backport fine to qemu 1.0 with on top of cherry-picked 922453bca6a9, dbffbdcfff69, e8ee5e4c476d. Time for us to test them a bit... Cheers, Chris.