From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43696) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0xEE-0003Wi-4D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:38:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0xE8-0005Wf-08 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:38:38 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10917) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0xE7-0005Wb-Ml for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:38:31 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:56:23 -0200 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20120224125623.205fdd16@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <4F479D6F.3000302@suse.de> References: <1330092792-22455-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1330092792-22455-5-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <4F479D6F.3000302@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] boards: switch machine type list to QTAILQ List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?B?RuRyYmVy?= Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:23:43 +0100 Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > Am 24.02.2012 15:13, schrieb Luiz Capitulino: > > Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino >=20 > Unless this fixes a bug, I'd rather not refactor this as in my head this > is already just object_class_foreach() / object_class_by_name(), similar > to CPUs on my qom-cpu branch. Is there a plan to convert this to qom anytime soon? If there isn't, then I'd do the refactoring because the resulting code is simpler & cleaner.