From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] boards: switch machine type list to QTAILQ
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:23:27 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120224132327.17bbab41@doriath.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F47AB14.4010407@suse.de>
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:21:56 +0100
Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> Am 24.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:23:43 +0100
> > Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Am 24.02.2012 15:13, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> Unless this fixes a bug, I'd rather not refactor this as in my head this
> >> is already just object_class_foreach() / object_class_by_name(), similar
> >> to CPUs on my qom-cpu branch.
> >
> > Is there a plan to convert this to qom anytime soon?
>
> I was planning to look into it after CPU is done, if no one beats me.
> Since CPU will touch on the machine init functions, doing both in
> parallel did not seem like a good idea to me.
>
> I consider both CPU and machine 1.1 material - if we can agree on the
> way there, then the code you are changing here will not see a release.
> It certainly doesn't hurt to commit it though. :)
Well, if you're already planning to do it I can drop the patch then.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-24 14:13 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5]: Improve machine type functions Luiz Capitulino
2012-02-24 14:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] boards: qemu_register_machine(): return void Luiz Capitulino
2012-02-24 14:17 ` Andreas Färber
2012-02-24 14:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] boards: rename machine type functions Luiz Capitulino
2012-02-24 16:12 ` Peter Maydell
2012-02-24 16:15 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-24 16:51 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-02-24 16:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-24 14:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] boards: introduce machine_print_all() Luiz Capitulino
2012-02-24 14:26 ` Andreas Färber
2012-02-24 14:57 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-02-24 14:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] boards: switch machine type list to QTAILQ Luiz Capitulino
2012-02-24 14:23 ` Andreas Färber
2012-02-24 14:56 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-02-24 15:21 ` Andreas Färber
2012-02-24 15:23 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2012-02-24 14:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] boards: move all machine type functions to boards.c Luiz Capitulino
2012-02-24 15:10 ` Andreas Färber
2012-02-24 15:22 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-02-24 14:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5]: Improve machine type functions Anthony Liguori
2012-02-24 15:20 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-02-24 15:44 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120224132327.17bbab41@doriath.home \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).