From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55995)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1S0wzk-00049Z-R0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:23:49 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1S0wzX-0002uc-Ir
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:23:40 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10614)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1S0wzX-0002uL-7U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:23:27 -0500
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:23:27 -0200
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20120224132327.17bbab41@doriath.home>
In-Reply-To: <4F47AB14.4010407@suse.de>
References: <1330092792-22455-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
	<1330092792-22455-5-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
	<4F479D6F.3000302@suse.de> <20120224125623.205fdd16@doriath.home>
	<4F47AB14.4010407@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] boards: switch machine type list to
 QTAILQ
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?B?RuRyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:21:56 +0100
Andreas F=E4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:

> Am 24.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:23:43 +0100
> > Andreas F=E4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> >=20
> >> Am 24.02.2012 15:13, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> Unless this fixes a bug, I'd rather not refactor this as in my head th=
is
> >> is already just object_class_foreach() / object_class_by_name(), simil=
ar
> >> to CPUs on my qom-cpu branch.
> >=20
> > Is there a plan to convert this to qom anytime soon?
>=20
> I was planning to look into it after CPU is done, if no one beats me.
> Since CPU will touch on the machine init functions, doing both in
> parallel did not seem like a good idea to me.
>=20
> I consider both CPU and machine 1.1 material - if we can agree on the
> way there, then the code you are changing here will not see a release.
> It certainly doesn't hurt to commit it though. :)

Well, if you're already planning to do it I can drop the patch then.