From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44479) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2mBZ-0007LY-I8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:15:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2mBS-0007zR-PQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:15:25 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2mBS-0007zD-GW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:15:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:15:21 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20120229161521.GA8661@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] slirp memory leaks (from valgrind) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org valgrind run shows a memory leak in slirp: ==21745== 360 (168 direct, 192 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 700 of 856 ==21745== at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) ==21745== by 0x298F01: socreate (socket.c:48) ==21745== by 0x298FBC: tcp_listen (socket.c:601) ==21745== by 0x296325: slirp_add_hostfwd (slirp.c:794) ==21745== by 0x25E7BB: slirp_hostfwd (slirp.c:413) ==21745== by 0x25F7C6: net_init_slirp (slirp.c:254) ==21745== by 0x25BC72: net_client_init (net.c:1155) ==21745== by 0x27C759: qemu_opts_foreach (qemu-option.c:1053) ==21745== by 0x25AED1: net_init_clients (net.c:1452) ==21745== by 0x24EC5A: main (vl.c:3277) comments?