From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44735) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2mCg-0008TE-1H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:16:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2mCZ-0008AE-PQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:16:33 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2mCZ-0008A1-Gc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:16:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:16:31 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20120229161630.GB8661@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] port io mem leak List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: avi@redhat.com, Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Valgrind shows a memory leak below: ==21745== 208 (112 direct, 96 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 588 of 856 ==21745== at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) ==21745== by 0x24D4C5: malloc_and_trace (vl.c:2156) ==21745== by 0x50637D2: g_malloc (in /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.5) ==21745== by 0x21A519: isa_register_portio_list (isa-bus.c:102) ==21745== by 0x210DF7: ide_init_ioport (core.c:1993) ==21745== by 0x2169EF: pci_piix_ide_initfn (piix.c:137) ==21745== by 0x2269DD: pci_qdev_init (pci.c:1492) ==21745== by 0x274839: qdev_init (qdev.c:150) ==21745== by 0x27491C: qdev_init_nofail (qdev.c:243) ==21745== by 0x225DD7: pci_create_simple_multifunction (pci.c:1552) ==21745== by 0x216C7E: pci_piix3_ide_init (piix.c:224) ==21745== by 0x3380A6: pc_init1 (pc_piix.c:257)