From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, avi@redhat.com,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: add MMIO property
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:20:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120319212033.GB9747@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F67A021.6040601@us.ibm.com>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 03:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:19:33PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 03/19/2012 10:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>Currently virtio-pci is specified so that configuration of the device is
> >>>done through a PCI IO space (via BAR 0 of the virtual PCI device).
> >>>However, Linux guests happen to use ioread/iowrite/iomap primitives
> >>>for access, and these work uniformly across memory/io BARs.
> >>>
> >>>While PCI IO accesses are faster than MMIO on x86 kvm,
> >>>MMIO might be helpful on other systems which don't
> >>>implement PIO or where PIO is slower than MMIO.
> >>>
> >>>Add a property to make it possible to tweak the BAR type.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@redhat.com>
> >>>
> >>>This is harmless by default but causes segfaults in memory.c
> >>>when enabled. Thus an RFC until I figure out what's wrong.
> >>
> >>Doesn't this violate the virtio-pci spec?
> >>
> >
> >The point is to change the BAR type depending on the architecture.
> >IO is fastest on x86 but maybe not on other architectures.
>
> Are we going to document that the BAR is X on architecture Y in the spec?
>
> I think the better way to do this is to use a separate device id
> range for MMIO virtio-pci. You can make the same driver hand both
> ranges and that way the device is presented consistently to the
> guest regardless of what the architecture is.
Yes there are endless ways to do this.
This specific hack is good for making existing linux drivers
on ppc, arm etc work.
> >>Making the same vendor/device ID have different semantics depending
> >>on a magic flag in QEMU seems like a pretty bad idea to me.
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Anthony Liguori
> >
> >We do this with MSI-X so why not the BAR type?
>
> We extend the bar size with MSI-X and use a transport flag to
> indicate that it's available, right?
No, we use regular pci capability. Just like BAR type is
a regular PCI register :)
> Regards,
>
> Anthony LIguori
>
> >
> >>>
> >>>---
> >>> hw/virtio-pci.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> >>> hw/virtio-pci.h | 4 ++++
> >>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/hw/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio-pci.c
> >>>index 28498ec..6f338d2 100644
> >>>--- a/hw/virtio-pci.c
> >>>+++ b/hw/virtio-pci.c
> >>>@@ -655,6 +655,7 @@ void virtio_init_pci(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, VirtIODevice *vdev)
> >>> {
> >>> uint8_t *config;
> >>> uint32_t size;
> >>>+ uint8_t bar0_type;
> >>>
> >>> proxy->vdev = vdev;
> >>>
> >>>@@ -684,8 +685,14 @@ void virtio_init_pci(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, VirtIODevice *vdev)
> >>>
> >>> memory_region_init_io(&proxy->bar,&virtio_pci_config_ops, proxy,
> >>> "virtio-pci", size);
> >>>- pci_register_bar(&proxy->pci_dev, 0, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO,
> >>>-&proxy->bar);
> >>>+
> >>>+ if (proxy->flags& VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO) {
> >>>+ bar0_type = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
> >>>+ } else {
> >>>+ bar0_type = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO;
> >>>+ }
> >>>+
> >>>+ pci_register_bar(&proxy->pci_dev, 0, bar0_type,&proxy->bar);
> >>>
> >>> if (!kvm_has_many_ioeventfds()) {
> >>> proxy->flags&= ~VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD;
> >>>@@ -823,6 +830,7 @@ static Property virtio_blk_properties[] = {
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_BIT("ioeventfd", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD_BIT, true),
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("vectors", VirtIOPCIProxy, nvectors, 2),
> >>> DEFINE_VIRTIO_BLK_FEATURES(VirtIOPCIProxy, host_features),
> >>>+ DEFINE_PROP_BIT("mmio", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT, false),
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>>@@ -856,6 +864,7 @@ static Property virtio_net_properties[] = {
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("x-txtimer", VirtIOPCIProxy, net.txtimer, TX_TIMER_INTERVAL),
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_INT32("x-txburst", VirtIOPCIProxy, net.txburst, TX_BURST),
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_STRING("tx", VirtIOPCIProxy, net.tx),
> >>>+ DEFINE_PROP_BIT("mmio", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT, false),
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>>@@ -888,6 +897,7 @@ static Property virtio_serial_properties[] = {
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_HEX32("class", VirtIOPCIProxy, class_code, 0),
> >>> DEFINE_VIRTIO_COMMON_FEATURES(VirtIOPCIProxy, host_features),
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("max_ports", VirtIOPCIProxy, serial.max_virtserial_ports, 31),
> >>>+ DEFINE_PROP_BIT("mmio", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT, false),
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>>@@ -915,6 +925,7 @@ static TypeInfo virtio_serial_info = {
> >>>
> >>> static Property virtio_balloon_properties[] = {
> >>> DEFINE_VIRTIO_COMMON_FEATURES(VirtIOPCIProxy, host_features),
> >>>+ DEFINE_PROP_BIT("mmio", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT, false),
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>>@@ -969,6 +980,7 @@ static int virtio_scsi_exit_pci(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
> >>> static Property virtio_scsi_properties[] = {
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("vectors", VirtIOPCIProxy, nvectors, 2),
> >>> DEFINE_VIRTIO_SCSI_PROPERTIES(VirtIOPCIProxy, host_features, scsi),
> >>>+ DEFINE_PROP_BIT("mmio", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT, false),
> >>> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/hw/virtio-pci.h b/hw/virtio-pci.h
> >>>index e560428..e6a8861 100644
> >>>--- a/hw/virtio-pci.h
> >>>+++ b/hw/virtio-pci.h
> >>>@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@
> >>> #define VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD_BIT 1
> >>> #define VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD (1<< VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD_BIT)
> >>>
> >>>+/* Some guests don't support port IO. Use MMIO instead. */
> >>>+#define VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT 2
> >>>+#define VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO (1<< VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT)
> >>>+
> >>> typedef struct {
> >>> PCIDevice pci_dev;
> >>> VirtIODevice *vdev;
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-19 15:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: add MMIO property Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-19 17:58 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-19 18:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-20 14:49 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-19 19:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-19 20:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-19 21:07 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-19 21:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2012-03-19 21:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-19 22:13 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-19 23:52 ` Rusty Russell
2012-03-20 0:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-06-18 12:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120319212033.GB9747@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).