From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v3] kvm: notify host when guest panicked
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:33:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120322073324.GZ22368@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F6A2642.1060107@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:04:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 05:47 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>>On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >>>>Do you have any other comments about this patch?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Not really, but I'm not 100% convinced the patch is worthwhile. It's
> >>>likely to only be used by Linux, which has kexec facilities, and you can
> >>>put talk to management via virtio-serial and describe the crash in more
> >>>details than a simple hypercall.
> >>
> >>As mentioned before, I don't think virtio-serial is a good fit for this.
> >>We want something that is simple& guaranteed always available. Using
> >>virtio-serial requires significant setup work on both the host and guest.
> >
> >So what? It needs to be done anyway for the guest agent.
> >
> >>Many management application won't know to make a vioserial device available
> >>to all guests they create.
> >
> >Then they won't know to deal with the panic event either.
> >
> >>Most administrators won't even configure kexec,
> >>let alone virtio serial on top of it.
> >
> >It should be done by the OS vendor, not the individual admin.
> >
> >>The hypercall requires zero host
> >>side config, and zero guest side config, which IMHO is what we need for
> >>this feature.
> >
> >If it was this one feature, yes. But we keep getting more and more
> >features like that and we bloat the hypervisor. There's a reason we
> >have a host-to-guest channel, we should use it.
>
> The problem is that virtio-serial sucks for something like this.
>
How do we know if we haven't tried :)
> We have two options I think:
>
> 1) We could reserve a portion of the hypercall space to be deferred
> to userspace for stuff like this.
>
> 2) We could invent a new hypercall like facility that was less
> bloated than virtio-serial for stuff like this using MMIO/PIO.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
> >
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-22 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-08 7:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v3] kvm: notify host when guest panicked Wen Congyang
2012-03-08 8:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2 " Wen Congyang
2012-03-08 8:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2 v3] kvm: set exit_reason to KVM_EXIT_GUEST_PANICKED " Wen Congyang
2012-03-08 8:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2 v3] update linux-headers Wen Congyang
2012-03-08 8:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2 v3] deal with guest panicked event Wen Congyang
2012-03-08 10:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-03-08 10:11 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-08 10:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RESEND][PATCH " Wen Congyang
2012-03-08 11:28 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-08 11:36 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-03-08 11:52 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-08 11:56 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-03-09 22:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-21 19:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-12 1:46 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-08 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v3] kvm: notify host when guest panicked Avi Kivity
2012-03-09 1:21 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-12 9:04 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-12 10:33 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-13 6:44 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-13 8:54 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-13 9:18 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-03-13 10:47 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-14 8:29 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-14 9:24 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-14 9:53 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-14 10:07 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-14 10:26 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-14 10:29 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-14 10:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-14 10:48 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-14 11:11 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-14 13:07 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-14 13:13 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-14 13:14 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-14 13:16 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-14 13:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-14 18:46 ` Eric Northup
2012-03-15 7:01 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-15 10:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-15 11:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-03-15 11:46 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-16 8:05 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-21 19:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-22 8:34 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-14 18:47 ` Eric Northup
2012-03-14 10:37 ` Amit Shah
2012-03-14 10:52 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-14 10:52 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-14 10:57 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-14 10:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-14 11:13 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-14 10:52 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-14 10:58 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-14 10:59 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-03-14 11:06 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-14 11:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-14 11:17 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-03-14 10:59 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-14 10:57 ` Amit Shah
2012-03-14 9:51 ` Amit Shah
2012-03-14 10:04 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-14 10:08 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-14 10:40 ` Amit Shah
2012-03-14 10:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-14 10:57 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-03-14 11:01 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-21 19:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-22 7:33 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2012-03-12 10:31 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-19 7:33 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-20 9:59 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-20 15:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-21 0:56 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-21 9:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-21 9:35 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-21 9:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-21 16:18 ` Corey Minyard
2012-03-21 16:24 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-21 16:25 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-21 17:04 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-03-21 17:34 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-21 18:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-03-21 19:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-22 1:05 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-22 7:31 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-22 7:44 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-22 8:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-22 7:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-03-22 7:40 ` Wen Congyang
2012-04-02 10:05 ` Wen Congyang
2012-04-02 10:54 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120322073324.GZ22368@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).