From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFLlC-0006Ud-05 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 04:40:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFLl3-0007vF-PR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 04:40:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFLl3-0007u0-ID for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 04:40:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:40:15 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20120404084014.GD3003@redhat.com> References: <4F7B4CCA.5020702@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F7B4CCA.5020702@siemens.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH v2 0/4] uq/master: Basic MSI support for in-kernel irqchip mode List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-04-03 09:23, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in > > kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed > > KVM_SIGNAL_MSI IOCTL. > > > > This series depends on "kvm: set gsi_bits and max_gsi correctly" > > (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/88906). > > > > Jan Kiszka (4): > > kvm: Refactor KVMState::max_gsi to gsi_count > > kvm: Introduce basic MSI support for in-kernel irqchips > > KVM: x86: Wire up MSI support for in-kernel irqchip > > kvm: Add support for direct MSI injections > > > > hw/apic.c | 3 + > > hw/kvm/apic.c | 33 +++++++++- > > hw/pc.c | 5 -- > > kvm-all.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > kvm.h | 1 + > > 5 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > As we obviously agreed on the general direction regarding an MSI > injection interface, I think patches 1-3 can lose their RFC tags and are > ready for uq/master (provided there are no further review comments). > Patch 4 will be reworked once the kernel interface is finalized. > > Jan I agree. Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > -- > Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 > Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux