From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFomd-00077e-UD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:39:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFomV-0004UU-J2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:39:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFomV-0004UF-Bd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:39:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 18:39:34 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20120405153933.GC1089@redhat.com> References: <20120405050848.31461.10826.stgit@bling.home> <20120405123108.GA32289@redhat.com> <1333638874.2427.34.camel@ul30vt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1333638874.2427.34.camel@ul30vt> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] PCI hotplug fixes/cleanup List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Williamson Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, gleb@redhat.com, jbaron@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, yamahata@valinux.co.jp, kraxel@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, aurelien@aurel32.net On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:14:34AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 15:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Which commit is this series against? > > When trying to apply to my tree, I get conflicts. > > Sorry, it's off qemu-kvm, it was too late when I sent this. Let me > re-order to send the fix separately so we can continue to discuss the > doc/undefined behavior. Thanks, > > Alex Let's keep returning 0 on eject however so that it can serve as a versioning register.