From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37113) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSXOI-0008UK-W2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:43:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSXOG-0000cW-DD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:43:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSXOG-0000bT-4a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:43:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 20:42:57 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20120510174257.GD14647@redhat.com> References: <20111214010645.GA2044@morn.localdomain> <20120509072452.14872.92530.stgit@t> <4FABF832.1060708@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FABF832.1060708@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH v3] hotplug: add device per func in ACPI DSDT tables List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jiang Liu Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, rjw@sisk.pl, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kevin@koconnor.net, Amos Kong On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:17:38AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > On 05/09/2012 03:24 PM, Amos Kong wrote: > > > --- > > src/ssdt-pcihp.dsl | 17 > > src/ssdt-pcihp.hex | 8869 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 2 files changed, 8781 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/ssdt-pcihp.dsl b/src/ssdt-pcihp.dsl > > index 4b435b8..2a3c326 100644 > > --- a/src/ssdt-pcihp.dsl > > +++ b/src/ssdt-pcihp.dsl > > @@ -17,14 +17,23 @@ DefinitionBlock ("ssdt-pcihp.aml", "SSDT", 0x01, "BXPC", "BXSSDTPCIHP", 0x1) > > // at runtime, if the slot is detected to not support hotplug. > > // Extract the offset of the address dword and the > > // _EJ0 name to allow this patching. > > -#define hotplug_slot(slot) \ > > - Device (S##slot) { \ > > +#define hotplug_func(slot, fn) \ > > + Device (S##slot##fn) { \ > > ACPI_EXTRACT_NAME_DWORD_CONST aml_adr_dword \ > > - Name (_ADR, 0x##slot##0000) \ > > + Name (_ADR, 0x##slot##000##fn) \ > > ACPI_EXTRACT_METHOD_STRING aml_ej0_name \ > > Method (_EJ0, 1) { Return(PCEJ(0x##slot)) } \ > > Name (_SUN, 0x##slot) \ > > } > It would be perfect if the Device object could also support _PS0 and _STA > methods. It needs qemu support, and some backward compatibility hack. Why? > Could we re-add the slot back after hot-removing it from the guest > OS with this ACPI implementation? Say execute following scripts from guest OS. > echo 0 > /sys/bus/pci/slot/xx/power > echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/slot/xx/power No because qemu removes device after eject. Do you have a need for this functionality? What is it?