From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STzqJ-0002Uf-V9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:18:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STzqG-0004zL-OD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:17:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STzqG-0004yu-FH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:17:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:18:09 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20120514151809.3592633e@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <20120514181235.GE28865@illuin> References: <1336763987-10920-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <4FB13B94.4070903@redhat.com> <4FB13E1E.6010605@redhat.com> <20120514181235.GE28865@illuin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2]: qemu-ga: make shutdown & suspend synchronous List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Roth Cc: Michal Privoznik , Eric Blake , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, 14 May 2012 13:12:35 -0500 Michael Roth wrote: > Additionally, *all* commands carry the risk that qemu-ga can die > (killed, crashed, guest reboots, not being installed to begin with, etc) before > issuing a response, so a timeout mechanism *must* be in place if it blocks > libvirt. True. This is unrelated to qemu-ga, but I think libvirt should allow the user to change the timeout. You could have a very long default timeout, or even infinite.