From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47469) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXf1z-0004bu-0i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 16:53:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXf1x-0002YF-GO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 16:53:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXf1x-0002Xd-7X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 16:53:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 17:53:21 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20120524175321.31254444@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <1337882362-20100-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> References: <1337882362-20100-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/16] net: hub-based networking List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: zwu.kernel@gmail.com Cc: stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:59:06 +0800 zwu.kernel@gmail.com wrote: > From: Zhi Yong Wu > > The patchset implements network hub stead of vlan. The main work was done by stefan, and i rebased it to latest QEMU upstream, did some testings and am responsible for pushing it to QEMU upstream. Honest question: does it really pay off to have this in qemu vs. using one of the externaly available solutions?