From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35663)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1SXu0y-0005hC-6N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 08:53:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1SXu0s-0003p3-3J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 08:53:07 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40139)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1SXu0r-0003oy-SE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 08:53:02 -0400
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:53:13 -0300
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20120525095313.116f680f@doriath.home>
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QW=fkLFaH7PdwOPqwykykE_wf_Wq7w9b+32+-K3sjnk=w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1337882362-20100-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com>
	<20120524175321.31254444@doriath.home>
	<20120525100753.GD30110@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain>
	<m3vcjkfr04.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<CAJSP0QW=fkLFaH7PdwOPqwykykE_wf_Wq7w9b+32+-K3sjnk=w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/16] net: hub-based networking
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, zwu.kernel@gmail.com, wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com

On Fri, 25 May 2012 13:01:37 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree it would be nice to drop entirely but I don't feel happy doing
> that to users who might have QEMU buried in scripts somewhere.  One
> day they upgrade packages and suddenly their stuff doesn't work
> anymore.

This is very similar to kqemu and I don't think we regret having dropped it.