From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXv0G-0007Vu-01 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:56:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXv09-0004GI-R5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:56:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXv09-0004F2-Ix for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:56:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:56:28 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20120525105628.1a1f3f8d@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <4FBF8D70.1030304@redhat.com> References: <1337882362-20100-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> <20120524175321.31254444@doriath.home> <20120525100753.GD30110@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain> <20120525095313.116f680f@doriath.home> <4FBF822D.9090707@redhat.com> <20120525100746.51d7bf28@doriath.home> <4FBF85BF.6050403@redhat.com> <20120525101830.1793d300@doriath.home> <4FBF86E0.7070908@redhat.com> <20120525103004.23cfc4f4@doriath.home> <4FBF8B0B.1090601@redhat.com> <20120525104322.2da0b0ba@doriath.home> <4FBF8D70.1030304@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/16] net: hub-based networking List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , zwu.kernel@gmail.com, wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:47:28 +0200 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 25/05/2012 15:43, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: > >> Yeah, VDE probably includes something like an hub. But then we could > >> drop even "-net socket", "-net udp", "-net dump", and only leave in > >> vde+tap+slirp. Or even move slirp into VDE. :) That's a very different > >> thing. > > > > Let's start with what is hurting us. > > But is it? The patch makes it quite clean. vlan is and the cleanest solution is to drop it. But that's just my opnion, I won't (and possibly can't) nack this.