From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54517) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ScdMY-0007Jo-FB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:07:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ScdMU-0001tj-Dx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:06:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ScdMU-0001tc-6Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:06:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 10:06:50 -0400 From: Jason Baron Message-ID: <20120607140649.GB12564@redhat.com> References: <20120511145725.16518.77110.stgit@t> <1337507865-28504-1-git-send-email-kongjianjun@gmail.com> <20120604201556.GA2594@redhat.com> <20120604215202.GA3193@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120604215202.GA3193@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] pci: call object_unparent() before free_qdev() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, Amos Kong , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:52:02AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 04:15:56PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 05:57:45PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > > Start VM with 8 multiple-function block devs, hot-removing > > > those block devs by 'device_del ...' would cause qemu abort. > > > > > > | (qemu) device_del virti0-0-0 > > > | (qemu) ** > > > |ERROR:qom/object.c:389:object_delete: assertion failed: (obj->ref == 0) > > > > > > It's a regression introduced by commit 57c9fafe > > > > > > > I found a similar assertion where the parent reference isn't cleared, > > doing: > > > > (qemu) device_add pci-bridge > > > > in the monitor. I posted for patches for it under: > > > > Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] pci: hotplug bridge fixes > > > > It's still an issue with the current tree. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Jason > > I pushed your patches on my tree pci branch, care to test > there? > Yes, fixes are confirmed. Test case is quite simple: (qemu) device_add pci_bridge causes segfault without the 2 patches applied. Thanks, -Jason