From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SelOv-00047Q-KP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:06:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SelOq-0004co-Rf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:06:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SelOq-0004cZ-Jo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:06:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:06:34 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20120613110633.GC18001@redhat.com> References: <1339513523-1699-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <1339513523-1699-6-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <20120612151557.GA10691@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V12 5/9] Revert "pci: don't export an internal function" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Anthony Perard , Anthony Liguori , QEMU-devel , Xen Devel On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:56:34AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 04:05:19PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > > This reverts commit 94a09e2c846374a96719cda2b4e1312d8c4b08a7. > > > > > > This function is used by a later patch to parse the BDF of the device to > > > passthrough. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD > > > > You probably want to parse the host address? You don't want to copy the > > bugs in pci_parse_devaddr - write your own that has sane semantics > > for host. E.g. you need to support ARI etc. > > Aside from this minor comment, do you have any objections to this series? Aside from this, there are minor pci core changes and these are all fine. I can't say I looked at the device itself too deeply but seems mergeable. > It has been outstanding for 9 months now, and the last few versions have > been without any major changes. > Considering that a new QEMU release cycle has just opened, I think that > now would be the perfect time to get the series in.