From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] [PATCHv2 2/2] Adding basic calls to libseccomp in vl.c
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:38:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120618083846.GE28026@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120618083103.GC28026@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:31:03AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:02:19PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Friday, June 15, 2012 07:06:10 PM Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > I think allowing execve() would render seccomp pretty much useless.
> >
> > Not necessarily.
> >
> > I'll agree that it does seem a bit odd to allow execve(), but there is still
> > value in enabling seccomp to disable potentially buggy/exploitable syscalls.
> > Let's not forget that we have over 300 syscalls on x86_64, not including the
> > 32 bit versions, and even if we add all of the new syscalls suggested in this
> > thread we are still talking about a small subset of syscalls. As far as
> > security goes, the old adage of "less is more" applies.
>
> I can sort of see this argument, but *only* if the QEMU process is being
> run under a dedicated, fully unprivileged (from a DAC pov) user, completely
> separate from anything else on the system.
Or, of course, for a QEMU already confined by SELinux.
> If QEMU were being run as root, then even with seccomp, it could trivially
> just overwrite some binary in /bin, update /proc/core-pattern to point to
> this binary, and then crash itself. Now that core handling binary will
> execute without any of the seccomp filters applied.
>
> Similarly if QEMU is being run in the user's desktop session, I'm sure there
> is some kind of similar attack possible by changing a config setting for the
> user's GNOME/KDE session, and then waiting for GNOME/KDE to execute the script
> that QEMU just wrote out, once again bypassing seccomp.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-18 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-13 19:20 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] [PATCHv2 0/2] Sandboxing Qemu guests with Libseccomp Eduardo Otubo
2012-06-13 19:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] [PATCHv2 1/2] Adding support for libseccomp in configure Eduardo Otubo
2012-06-13 19:45 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-13 19:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] [PATCHv2 2/2] Adding basic calls to libseccomp in vl.c Eduardo Otubo
2012-06-13 19:56 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-13 20:33 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-06-15 19:04 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-18 8:33 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-06-18 15:22 ` Corey Bryant
2012-06-18 20:18 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-18 21:53 ` Corey Bryant
[not found] ` <CABqD9hYKLf9D37XsF6nvNmtJ=0wJ39Yu_A-JeWxDJ_8haBmEWA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4FE08025.6030406@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <CABqD9ha32FAuikpDojzO91Jg8Q6VTY340LShKzpvTx6FN_uacQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-19 16:51 ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-01 13:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-02 2:18 ` Will Drewry
2012-07-02 14:20 ` Corey Bryant
2012-06-13 20:30 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-06-15 19:06 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-15 21:02 ` Paul Moore
2012-06-15 21:23 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-15 21:36 ` Paul Moore
2012-06-16 6:46 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-18 17:41 ` Corey Bryant
2012-06-19 11:04 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-19 18:58 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-21 8:04 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <4FEB7A4D.7050608@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAAu8pHtYmoJ7WCK7LAOj_j2YU-nAgiLTg7q4qXL3Vu-kPRpZnw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-02 18:05 ` Corey Bryant
2012-07-03 19:15 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-15 21:44 ` Eric Blake
2012-06-18 8:31 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-06-18 8:38 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2012-06-18 13:52 ` Paul Moore
2012-06-18 13:55 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-06-18 14:02 ` Paul Moore
2012-06-18 20:13 ` Eduardo Otubo
2012-06-18 20:23 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-18 15:29 ` Corey Bryant
2012-06-18 20:15 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-19 9:23 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-06-19 18:44 ` Blue Swirl
2012-06-18 8:26 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-06-13 20:37 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-06-13 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] [PATCHv2 0/2] Sandboxing Qemu guests with Libseccomp Paul Moore
2012-06-14 21:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [libseccomp-discuss] " Kees Cook
2012-06-15 13:54 ` Paul Moore
2012-10-29 15:11 ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-29 15:32 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-10-29 15:40 ` Paul Moore
2012-10-29 15:51 ` Corey Bryant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120618083846.GE28026@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).