From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SgYiD-0002uq-HF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 05:57:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SgYiB-0007hP-G8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 05:57:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SgYiB-0007gw-8Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 05:57:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:57:21 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20120618095721.GA23134@redhat.com> References: <20120614181104.23440.62204.stgit@bling.home> <20120614213120.GA22915@redhat.com> <4FDED359.9010102@web.de> <20120618071913.GA19877@redhat.com> <4FDEF39D.3050503@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FDEF39D.3050503@siemens.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/8] msix: Support specifying offsets, BARs, and capability location List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Alex Williamson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:23:41AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-06-18 09:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:06:01AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> On 2012-06-14 23:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:15:42PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > >>>> v3: > >>>> - more patches, smaller diff, must be headed in the right direction > >>>> - macros for all hardcoded values in msix_init_exclusive_bar > >>>> - fold msix_add_config into msix_init allowing less churn to moving > >>>> around msix_uninit > >>>> - note native endian bug > >>>> - split msix_mmio_read move to separate patch > >>>> - split changing return value of msix_uninit to separate patch > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Alex > >>> > >>> Thanks, applied all. > >>> Will test/push next week. > >> > >> Could you publish your queue? I'd like to rebase my missing bits. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ja > >> > > > > Will do. FYI Anthony said on irc he objects to the caching approach, > > asked for more time to review it all. Maybe we'll have to > > go back to your original idea of a special API just for > > assigned devices. > > Yes, we can still add caching on top. > > I really like to have some hook upstream soon as time is running out > quickly for the 1.2 merge window and there is still some work to do on > the qemu-kvm side. > > Jan Anthony are your ideas for 1.2 timeframe? > -- > Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 > Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux