From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sgkcd-0007me-Kr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:40:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sgkcb-0002Zz-N0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:40:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sgkcb-0002ZW-F5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:40:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 01:40:30 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20120618224030.GB1863@redhat.com> References: <20120614181104.23440.62204.stgit@bling.home> <20120614213120.GA22915@redhat.com> <4FDED359.9010102@web.de> <20120618071913.GA19877@redhat.com> <4FDEF39D.3050503@siemens.com> <20120618095721.GA23134@redhat.com> <4FDF04C1.6020804@siemens.com> <4FDFAD99.9040800@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FDFAD99.9040800@web.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/8] msix: Support specifying offsets, BARs, and capability location List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Alex Williamson , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Anthony Liguori On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:37:13AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-06-18 12:36, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>>>> Could you publish your queue? I'd like to rebase my missing bits. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Ja > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Will do. FYI Anthony said on irc he objects to the caching approach, > >>>> asked for more time to review it all. Maybe we'll have to > >>>> go back to your original idea of a special API just for > >>>> assigned devices. > >>> > >>> Yes, we can still add caching on top. > >>> > >>> I really like to have some hook upstream soon as time is running out > >>> quickly for the 1.2 merge window and there is still some work to do on > >>> the qemu-kvm side. > >>> > >>> Jan > >> > >> Anthony are your ideas for 1.2 timeframe? > > > > http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.2 > > How to proceed? Your queue currently contains the caching, my add-on > patches make use of it. I can change them to not do this, but I'd like > to learn the preferred direction first. > > Jan > Let's give Anthony a bit of time to respond, I think he's traveling.