From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38920) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SisOA-0000tv-Kk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:22:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SisO9-0005jK-4i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:22:26 -0400 Received: from mail.duskware.de ([91.199.88.144]:62617) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SisO8-0005jD-UG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:22:25 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:22:23 +0200 From: Martin Husemann Message-ID: <20120624192223.GA3185@mail.duskware.de> References: <20120624191911.GA4914@mail.duskware.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120624191911.GA4914@mail.duskware.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] This is a bug, isn't it? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Ah, my eyes get bad - please disregard, foudn the DMA_INTREN vs. DMA_INTR differences :-( Martin