From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/13] Add spent time for migration
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:36:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120711153631.6af83928@doriath.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFDC522.9070500@redhat.com>
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:25:38 -0600
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/11/2012 12:08 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:43:57 +0200
> > Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> We add time spent for migration to the output of "info migrate"
> >> command. 'total_time' means time since the start fo migration if
> >> migration is 'active', and total time of migration if migration is
> >> completed. As we are also interested in transferred ram when
> >> migration completes, adding all ram statistics
> >
> > I see this has already been merged and am sorry for being late with my
> > review, but it turns out that there are a few issues to be addressed in
> > this patch, comments inlined below.
> >
> > Another point is that this patch extends the query-migrate command. We've
> > decided not to extend QMP commands, however I think that we should relax
> > that restriction for query commands, because the client doesn't need to know
> > the new fields in advance.
>
> I see a difference between extending output (such as query command
> return values), where clients can gracefully deal with the absence of a
> parameter from an older qemu, and extending input (where it is hard to
> tell up-front whether a parameter will be rejected by an older qemu).
> This is a case of extending output, so I am okay with it; in fact, I'd
> rather extend output of existing commands than add a new command,
> because then libvirt has to probe which command to call, instead of
> calling one command and then parsing everything available.
Yes, agreed. At least until we have libqmp...
> >> + monitor_printf(mon, "total time: %" PRIu64 " milliseconds\n",
> >> + info->ram->total_time);
> >
> > This adds a new line to the HMP output between the end of the ram stats and
> > the disk stats. Iirc libvirt parses this output when in non-json mode, although
> > I don't think it ever does it for disk migration.
> >
> > Eric, does libvirt do that?
>
> Libvirt forces the use of QMP for qemu 0.15 and newer. So while there
> may be other users that care, libvirt could care less whether HMP output
> changes between qemu 1.1 and 1.2.
Good to know.
>
> >> +++ b/migration.c
> >> @@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ MigrationInfo *qmp_query_migrate(Error **errp)
> >> info->ram->transferred = ram_bytes_transferred();
> >> info->ram->remaining = ram_bytes_remaining();
> >> info->ram->total = ram_bytes_total();
> >> + info->ram->total_time = qemu_get_clock_ms(rt_clock)
> >> + - s->total_time;
> >>
> >
> > I really don't think that 'total_time' pertains to the ram stats info, I think
> > it should be in the MigrationInfo dict.
>
> If so, now's the time to change it before it becomes locked in stone
> with the qemu 1.2 release. Libvirt has not yet been taught to use the
> new information.
Juan, if you agree with the change I can do it myself, or you could submit the
patch and I'll apply it to the QMP tree.
>
> >> #
> >> # @total: total amount of bytes involved in the migration process
> >> #
> >> +# @total_time: tota0l amount of ms since migration started. If
> >
> > s/total0l/total
> >
> > s/ms/miliseconds
>
> Actually, milliseconds
Thanks.
> >> +# migration has ended, it returns the total migration
> >> +# time. (since 1.2)
> >> +#
> >> # Since: 0.14.0.
> >> ##
> >> { 'type': 'MigrationStats',
> >> - 'data': {'transferred': 'int', 'remaining': 'int', 'total': 'int' } }
> >> + 'data': {'transferred': 'int', 'remaining': 'int', 'total': 'int' ,
> >> + 'total_time': 'int' } }
>
> Also, s/total_time/total-time/ - QMP favors '-' over '_'
>
> >>
> >> ##
> >> # @MigrationInfo
> >> @@ -275,8 +280,9 @@
> >> # 'cancelled'. If this field is not returned, no migration process
>
> Did we ever decide whether to favor US (canceled) or UK (cancelled)?
I don't think so :) Maybe we should accept both?
Would a UK grammar teacher mark 'canceled' as wrong (or vice-versa in the US)? :)
>
> >> # has been initiated
> >> #
> >> -# @ram: #optional @MigrationStats containing detailed migration status,
> >> -# only returned if status is 'active'
> >> +# @ram: #optional @MigrationStats containing detailed migration
> >> +# status, only returned if status is 'active' or
> >> +# 'completed'. 'comppleted' (since 1.2)
>
> s/comppleted/completed/
>
> >> #
> >> # @disk: #optional @MigrationStats containing detailed disk migration
> >> # status, only returned if status is 'active' and it is a block
> >
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1340987905.git.quintela@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <2b6cf8e2cf421bb6645a653bd7d79a5d321faee1.1340987905.git.quintela@redhat.com>
2012-07-11 18:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/13] Add spent time for migration Luiz Capitulino
2012-07-11 18:25 ` Eric Blake
2012-07-11 18:36 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2012-07-11 19:32 ` Juan Quintela
2012-08-13 19:39 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-08-13 19:46 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120711153631.6af83928@doriath.home \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).