qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	benoit.canet@gmail.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	stefanha@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 1/3] block: Add bdrv_are_busy()
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:55:48 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120724095548.2bf348d8@doriath.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120724101039.GA2118@irqsave.net>

On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:10:39 +0200
Benoît Canet <benoit.canet@irqsave.net> wrote:

> Le Monday 23 Jul 2012 à 14:15:01 (-0300), Luiz Capitulino a écrit :
> > On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:22:58 +0200
> > benoit.canet@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Benoît Canet <benoit@irqsave.net>
> > > 
> > > bdrv_are_busy will be used to check if any of the bs are in use
> > > or if one of them have a running block job.
> > > 
> > > The first user will be qmp_migrate().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Canet <benoit@irqsave.net>
> > > ---
> > >  block.c |   13 +++++++++++++
> > >  block.h |    2 ++
> > >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> > > index ce7eb8f..bc8f160 100644
> > > --- a/block.c
> > > +++ b/block.c
> > > @@ -4027,6 +4027,19 @@ out:
> > >      return ret;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +int bdrv_are_busy(void)
> > > +{
> > > +    BlockDriverState *bs;
> > > +
> > > +    QTAILQ_FOREACH(bs, &bdrv_states, list) {
> > > +        if (bs->job || bdrv_in_use(bs)) {
> > > +            return -EBUSY;
> > > +        }
> > > +    }
> > 
> > IMO, this should return true/false. The name is a bit misleading too, as it
> > gives the impression that are existing bdrvs are busy. I'd call it
> > bdrv_any_busy() or bdrv_any_in_use().
> 
> Hello Anthony,
> 
> Stefanha is in favor of returning -EBUSY and Luiz Capitulino would prefer
> the function to return a boolean.
> Could you decide which option is the best ?

Stefan's opnion certainly has precedence over mine on block layer stuff,
this was just an IMO.

Stefan, did you consider returning a boolean?

> 
> Regards
> 
> Benoît
> 
> > 
> > > +
> > > +    return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  void *block_job_create(const BlockJobType *job_type, BlockDriverState *bs,
> > >                         int64_t speed, BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb,
> > >                         void *opaque, Error **errp)
> > > diff --git a/block.h b/block.h
> > > index c89590d..0a3de2f 100644
> > > --- a/block.h
> > > +++ b/block.h
> > > @@ -337,6 +337,8 @@ void bdrv_disable_copy_on_read(BlockDriverState *bs);
> > >  void bdrv_set_in_use(BlockDriverState *bs, int in_use);
> > >  int bdrv_in_use(BlockDriverState *bs);
> > >  
> > > +int bdrv_are_busy(void);
> > > +
> > >  enum BlockAcctType {
> > >      BDRV_ACCT_READ,
> > >      BDRV_ACCT_WRITE,
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-24 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-23 14:22 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 0/3] Block migration if any of the block device is busy benoit.canet
2012-07-23 14:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 1/3] block: Add bdrv_are_busy() benoit.canet
2012-07-23 17:15   ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-07-24 10:10     ` Benoît Canet
2012-07-24 12:55       ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2012-07-24 13:29         ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-24 14:37           ` Benoît Canet
2012-07-24 14:42             ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-23 14:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 2/3] qerror: Add error telling that block dev usage prevents migration benoit.canet
2012-07-23 17:09   ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-07-23 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 3/3] migration: block migration when any of the block device is busy benoit.canet
2012-07-23 14:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 0/3] Block migration if " Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-24  9:52 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-24 10:04   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-24 10:19     ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-24 11:12       ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120724095548.2bf348d8@doriath.home \
    --to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=benoit.canet@gmail.com \
    --cc=benoit.canet@irqsave.net \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).