From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuPO6-0000VV-QA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:50:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuPNw-00010J-8i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:50:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuPNw-00010C-0a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:49:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:50:27 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20120726115027.2ac4eaab@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <87mx2md9db.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> References: <1343235256-26310-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1343235256-26310-11-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <87mx2md9db.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/11] qerror: switch to qapi generated error macros and table List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:56:00 +0200 Markus Armbruster wrote: > Luiz Capitulino writes: > > > Previous commits added qapi infrastructure to automatically generate > > qerror macros and the qerror table from qapi-schema-errors.json. > > > > This commit drops the current error macros from qerror.h and the error > > table from qerror.c and use the generated ones instead. > > > > Please, note that qapi-error.c is actually _included_ by qerror.c. > > This is hacky, but the alternative is to make the table private to > > qapi-error.c and generate functions to return table entries. I think that > > doesn't pay much off. > > Functions? Why can't you simply put > > const QErrorStringTable qerror_table[NUMBER_OF_ERRORS]; > > into qapi-errors.h? Because it's included by qerror.h, which is included by several files. I don't like much the idea of including a .c file, but on the other hand it's only included by qerror.c and qerror.c will probably die in the near future. > > With a literal number instead of NUMBER_OF_ERRORS. If you suffer from > literal-phobia, you can also #define it instead. >