From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35955) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuSZ2-0003ck-5c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:13:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuSZ1-0005Ri-2s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:13:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuSZ0-0005RX-Q3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:13:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:37:24 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20120726133724.293bf8b1@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <50116A48.1050307@redhat.com> References: <1343249431-9245-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <87ehnyv7p8.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <50116A48.1050307@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/14]: add printf-like human msg to error_set() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com, Markus Armbruster , afaerber@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:03:20 +0200 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 26/07/2012 17:54, Markus Armbruster ha scritto: > > Unlike Anthony, I think this is a move in the right direction. > > Me too, but I would like to understand how it fits with the > qapi-schema-errors.json. Do we actually need a schema if the messages > are flat? Yes, we need it because we still an error object to obey (ie. the data member). But we're talking about dropping that, so it might be possible to kill the schema.