From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59936) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuT57-0001MM-5a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:46:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuT51-0000Vr-Ey for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:46:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuT51-0000VN-6O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:46:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:47:11 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20120726154711.30784ba5@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <20120726154358.69eee026@doriath.home> References: <87ipdacrhj.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <20120726154358.69eee026@doriath.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Plan for error handling in QMP List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: anthony@codemonkey.ws Cc: Kevin Wolf , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:43:58 -0300 Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:22:15 -0500 > anthony@codemonkey.ws wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > We had a violent^Wheated discussion on IRC about how to move forward > > with Luiz's proposed error series. I think we reached consensus. This > > note attempts to outline that. > > This looks great to me, violent^W heated discussions can be so productive :) > > > > > Principles > > ---------- > > 1. Errors should be free formed strings with a class code > > > > 2. There should be a small number of class codes (10-15) added > > strictly when there are specific users of a code. Btw, do we have a listing of those 10-15 errors already?