From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: add -libvirt-caps option for libvirt to stop parsing help output
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:35:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120727163528.GA2742@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87394dqwh4.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:23:03PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> > The above would take care of probably 50% of the current libvirt
> > capabilities probing, including a portion of the -help stuff. Then
> > there is all the rest of the crap we detect from the -help. We could
> > just take the view, that "as of 1.2", we assume everything we previously
> > detected is just available by default, and thus don't need to probe
> > it. For stuff that is QOM based, I expect we'll be able to detect new
> > features in the future using the qom-XXX monitor commands. For stuff
> > that is non-qdev, and non-qom, libvirt can just do a plain version
> > number check, unless we decide there is specific info worth exposing
> > via other new 'query-XXX' monitor commands.
>
> Assuming version X (according to query-version) supports no less than
> upstream version X sounds fair.
>
> If a command line option has a corresponding QMP command, probing QMP
> for the feature suffices. For instance, query-devices gives you devices
> for -device.
>
> I'm afraid there could still be an occasional need for probing the
> command line. A simple, machine-readable command line self-description
> could satisfy it. Something like:
>
> - query-cmdline-options: JSON representation of qemu_options[], with
> unnecessary detail elided. Basically option name and whether it takes
> an argument.
>
> For options with a QemuOpts argument, we may want to add argument
> self-description. Basically its QemuOptsList, with unnecessary detail
> elided. Non-QemuOpts arguments don't get that. New structured option
> arguments should use QemuOpts anyway.
I think you are quite possibly correct, but for the sake of enabling
us to move forward without more arguments, my inclination is to ignore
this just now :-) Lets get the new commands Anthony posted merged, and
port libvirt to use this new approach. Once that's all done, we can
evaluate whether there is a any more information we ought to provide
which might require a query-cmdline-options, or something else more
targetted (eg query-chardev-options or something)
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-27 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-25 19:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: add -libvirt-caps option for libvirt to stop parsing help output Anthony Liguori
2012-07-25 22:12 ` Eric Blake
2012-07-25 23:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-07-26 12:47 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-07-26 13:07 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-07-26 14:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-07-27 15:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-27 15:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-07-27 11:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-07-27 11:49 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-07-27 12:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-07-27 16:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2012-07-27 17:17 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120727163528.GA2742@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).