Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] pci,msi,virtio

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:05:25AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 11:39 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> writes:
> > 
> > > Am 19.07.2012 17:15, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > >> The following changes since commit 80aa796bf38b7ef21daa42673b4711510c450d8a:
> > >> 
> > >>   pci_bridge_dev: fix error path in pci_bridge_dev_initfn() (2012-06-11 22:55:13 +0300)
> > >> 
> > >> are available in the git repository at:
> > >> 
> > >>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/mst/qemu.git tags/for_anthony
> > >> 
> > >> for you to fetch changes up to 932d4a42afa28829fadf3cbfbb0507cc09aafd8b:
> > >> 
> > >>   msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data (2012-07-19 17:56:42 +0300)
> > >> 
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> pci,msi,virtio
> > >> 
> > >> This pull includes preparation patches mostly by Jan and Alex
> > >> that should help merge device assignment down the road.
> > >> And there's a new API needed for emulating POWER firmware.
> > >> 
> > >> So no new functionality and some unused APIs but it looks like
> > >> merging will help people make progress.
> > >> 
> > >> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > Usually, PULLs are expected to carry the individual patches as replies.
> > >
> > > But more important, did something go wrong with rebasing before sending
> > > out the PULL? June 11 is more than a month ago. And if I try to rebase
> > > my pci_host branch on your "pci" branch it tries to replay loads of
> > > really old post-1.1 commits (e.g., my "Pass PowerPCCPU to...") and
> > > fails... am I doing something wrong? "for_anthony" tag and "pci" branch
> > > seem to match in date at least.
> > 
> > 
> > It's a tag, not a branch.
> > 
> > I had to add an explicit remote to pull tags in.  I'm not sure if
> > there's a better way to do it in git.
> 
> Looks like it merged ok for me, but you'll need this to complete the
> PCIUnregisterFunc conversion.  Not sure how this built in MST's tree.

I didn't rebase my tree, this one is newer.

> Anthony, it'd be great if we could merge and fix this in your tree since
> MST is out of the office.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> commit 34e37573f1a983dab43673d664eb500bc87a46d4
> Author: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Date:   Mon Jul 23 10:59:43 2012 -0600
> 
>     esp: Update PCIUnregisterFunc function
>     
>     Function prototype changed in f90c2bcd
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/hw/esp.c b/hw/esp.c
> index c6422ad..a011347 100644
> --- a/hw/esp.c
> +++ b/hw/esp.c
> @@ -1153,13 +1153,11 @@ static int esp_pci_scsi_init(PCIDevice *dev)
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int esp_pci_scsi_uninit(PCIDevice *d)
> +static void esp_pci_scsi_uninit(PCIDevice *d)
>  {
>      PCIESPState *pci = DO_UPCAST(PCIESPState, dev, d);
>  
>      memory_region_destroy(&pci->io);
> -
> -    return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void esp_pci_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>