From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svhqf-0006Wy-PT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:44:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svhqe-0002Ac-P7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:44:53 -0400 Received: from e23smtp06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.148]:33981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svhqe-0002AS-6i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:44:52 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:44:31 +1000 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q6U4aJ9Z1573328 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:36:20 +1000 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q6U4iggP002331 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:44:42 +1000 Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:16:14 +0530 From: Bharata B Rao Message-ID: <20120730044614.GA9736@in.ibm.com> References: <20120725055806.GB1392@in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120725055806.GB1392@in.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] GlusterFS support in QEMU - v3 Reply-To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Anand Avati , Amar Tumballi , Vijay Bellur On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:28:06AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > Hi, > > This is the v3 of the patchset to support GlusterFS backend from QEMU. I am planning a v4 post to address a few minor cleanups suggested by Blue Swirl. I would like to know if there are any other comments or test scenarios that I need to take care before this GlusterFS support in QEMU can be considered for inclusion. I have tested these patches in the following scenarios: - local gluster volume (QEMU and gluster volume residing on the same m/c) - remote gluster volume - local distributed+replicated volume - remote distributed volume - use of 2 gluster drives - live migration (VM image resides on gluster volume consisting of bricks on machine A and B, migrating QEMU from machine C to D) When I say "tested", I mean that I have created VM images using qemu-img on these volumes, installed VM, booted from it and run fio benchmark with various cache options (none, writeback, writethrough) Regards, Bharata.